Main Changes to Local Plan 2030
View Comment
| Comment ID | MCLP/774 |
|---|---|
| Document Section | Main Changes to Local Plan 2030 Policy S5 - Land South of Pound Lane (MC12) Content [View all comments on this section] |
| Respondent | Molly Miller [View all comments by this respondent] |
| Response Date | 31 Aug 2017 |
| To be "Sound" a Plan should be Positively Prepared, Justified, Effective and Consistent with National Policy | |
| Do you consider that this ‘Main Change’ is sound? | No |
| If you consider the ‘Main Change’ is unsound, on which grounds do you consider it so (see guidance)? |
|
Please set out your representation here, relating to "soundness". If applicable, what changes do you propose to make the document "sound"? To help the independent Planning Inspector manage the examination, we ask that representations are concise and, where they are necessarily detailed, that you provide a concise summary setting out your main points. |
|
| Comment | The change is increasing the density of housing and this is not acceptable in rural communities, despite national policies and surveys on predictions for housing requirements. These kinds of surveys are often inaccurate. |
| Attachments | |
| Do you consider it necessary to participate at the oral part of the examination? | No |
| Does your representation relate to a new or a previously-submitted omission site? |
|
| If you have previously commented on the Local Plan, as a result of this ‘Main Change’ do you wish to withdraw, replace or add to any previous comments? |
|
| Do you consider that this ‘Main Change’ is Legally Compliant in accordance with the relevant regulations? |
|