Local Plan to 2030 Regulation 19 - Publication June 2016

Comment ID ALP/1725
Document Section Local Plan to 2030 - Publication Draft TOPIC POLICIES SECTION A - HOUSING Development of Residential Gardens Content View all on this section
Respondent Jacqueline Male View all by this respondent
Response Date 10 Aug 2016
Do you consider this part of the document is Sound? No
On which grounds do you consider the document unsound? (if applicable)
  • Not Justified
Do you consider the Document is Legally Compliant? Yes
Comment

I think development of rural gardens turning them over to housing is fundamentally wrong and that rural gardens should be considered as greenfield sites, so not for development, and not considered as brownfield sites. Such developments can be haphazard and you can end up with odds and ends that don't match. I understand that occasionally it might  be appropriate but I think these should be a rarity not the norm.

What changes do you suggest to make the document legally compliant or sound?
Do you consider it necessary to participate at the oral part of the examination? No
Does your representation relate to an omission site (a site that has not been included). For example a site for Housing, Employment, Travellers, or Local Green Spaces.
Please supply details of the omission site.
Attachments